Why AI, three services, the blockchain × AI workflow.
From data collection to reports, course materials and review, Tako's internal technical staff all work through the same AI-logic work system.
The same system can also support large enterprises with LLM adoption and application development.
The AI already knows what it needs to know; next is mastering Tools().
Counted by completed deliverables: deck pages, course-material language versions, per-pool estimates and independent acceptance checks.
Adoption and application development, extending the same work foundation.
Local first; the cloud fills in on hard problems.
Chinese · English · Vietnamese · Spanish: one set of course materials, developed across languages.
Self-optimizing and logging lessons, continually reducing human error.
Wiring business processes to AI: documents, reports, customer-service knowledge bases
Used internallyLocal model deployment, token usage control, review process design
Used internallyPull data from public APIs and let AI turn it into reports; the charts on this page are the finished product
Used internallyAll three capabilities are already used in Tako's internal workflows. Services do not include investment advice.
Hand off a task from the phone; the computer carries on the AI workflow.
The blockchain packs transactions and state updates into blocks, linked by hashes. AI reads the data and finds patterns; on-chain actions are authorized by people.
The user confirms the transaction and authorizes the contract action.
Updates assets and shares by programmed rules.
The transaction enters a block and is verified by the network.
Reads records, pool and vault state.
Aligns timestamps, computes ranges and alerts.
Checks against the raw data, then decides strategy.
The two data types are pulled separately; exchange data is not treated as fully on-chain. How blocks work: Ethereum.org ↗
On-chain records and market APIs are first shaped into features; the model then outputs range suggestions, alerts and the efficiency ratio. Data sources and timestamps must be aligned. (Architecture sketch, under construction)
The past 8 months of volume distribution, price paths and pool depth; the label is the efficiency ratio computed after the fact
The price range for the next liquidity placement, an alert on whether to exit, and this week's estimated efficiency ratio
The model only gives suggestions and a confidence level; adjusting the range, exiting or adding to a position is decided by people
Every trade, every pool, every vault is recorded on-chain. Pull the data via API, and AI does four things.
Public APIs from Enzyme, Uniswap, Orderly and CoinGecko; that is where this page's charts come from
Read volume distribution, liquidation maps and depth to work out which price band liquidity belongs in
Price leaving the range, IL exceeding fees, or a volatility spike triggers an alert
Weekly efficiency ratio = fees ÷ |IL|; above 1.5 healthy, below 1 exit
If you have specific Web3 build requirements,
I believe we can do it well, especially on cybersecurity.
Looking forward to working with you.
Thank you for reading.